“We need to get…..!” is a rallying cry many Churches make. When a new thing comes out and a Church sees another using it successfully, it’s not uncommon for a Church to follow along.
Calvin recently wrote about the Church and social media. He wrote about its effectiveness:
So is social media effective for a Church? It can be, but in most cases it probably isn’t. The shocking reality is that I bet most Churches know that their Facebook page isn’t producing anything; that is, except an image.
I agree that in most cases it is not effective. The question, however, is:
Why isn’t social media effective?
It’s often not effective because it is implemented and executed poorly. If done right, people will engage and it can be more successful at keeping people informed than any church bulletin.
The goal for this post is to focus on three separate tools for social media, highlighting the mistakes Churches make using them and providing the effective measures. I hope this guide will help you and your church to create a successful implementation or re-launch.
But first, it should be made clear who the audience is.
It’s simple:
1. Church websites for the large part, are for people new to the Church
2. Social media is for those who are already engaged with the Church
It is still the King of all social media. Having nearly 700 million users worldwide will do that. Lots of Churches have a Facebook page. Most of them stink. In the movie ‘Field of Dreams’, the main character, Ray Kinsella is told, “If you build it, they will come.” It was in reference to a baseball field. Unfortunately, people will not come to a Facebook page simply because it’s built. Here are several ways to use a Facebook page effectively:
1. Improve how it looks – I’ve seen Churches that don’t even bother to use an image on the main page. The default “info” or “wall” page is boring, especially for a new visitor. If you have somebody on staff that knows code (or a volunteer), using HTML, Javascript and CSS, a custom welcome page can be built. Lifechurch.tv offers an excellent example of this. If you don’t have access to somebody who can do that work, use a service such as Pagemodo. They offer easily customized templates. They have plans that allow for free pages and low cost monthly prices to have more than one page and removes any Pagemodo branding.
2. Updates, updates, updates – This cannot be stressed enough. Believe it or not, most people do not pay attention to what is in a Church bulletin, particularly those who are online. People in your Church utilize Facebook. Seeing updates about upcoming events, news, seeing photographs and seeing video will keep the engaged. It allows people to share these experiences with family members or friends.
3. Use a Facebook page, not a personal account – I’ve seen a number of Churches do this and it is a mistake. People don’t want to send a “friend request” to a Church account. In order to engage on Facebook page, all somebody needs to do is “like” that page. Speaking of engaging….
4. Allow people to post to the Facebook page wall – Monitor it so that inappropriate posts can be dealt with. But don’t make the Wall page nothing but a bulletin board. Allow people the ability to express a thought or ask a question if they want to.
Despite Twitter’s growth, there are many people who still do not “get it” when it comes to this technology. It’s no longer about “What you are doing” but so much more. Twitter can be an even more effective tool than Facebook in that it can influence those outside of the church community.
1. Update strategically and regularly – As this is a Church account, it cannot be handled like a personal account where one word, “Sigh” tweets are normal. A Church account is likely to be followed by people that do not attend that church so tweets need to be a mixture of relevant info for Church members/attenders and general information. Updating regularly is key to keeping people following. Weeks (even days) between updates will cause people to unfollow for they perceive to be a lack of interest on the part of the Church.
2. Follow, re-tweet and no auto DM’s – Don’t make the account a soapbox. Follow first and then seek to be followed. Don’t try anything sneaky. People have followed many to gain higher numbers only to turn around an un-follow in an effort to make them appear to be more influential. It won’t work.
Take an interest in what others are saying and re-tweet them. You’ll find that engaging in that way will bring about people who are truly interested in what you tweet.
Do not use a service to set up and automated direct message if somebody follows you. The overwhelming majority of people do not like it. If you want to send a DM, go right ahead. But make it personal.
3. Engage with those who follow you – Remember, you are tweeting from a “corporate” account. People will ask questions. Answer them as timely as possible. If you see a compliment, do not re-tweet it. Reply and thank them.
4. Don’t rely on the web interface – One of the advantages of using an application such as Tweetdeck or Hootsuite is that it will allow you to update several different accounts at the same time. Tweetdeck for instance allows you to update your Twitter account and your Facebook account as well as any Facebook page you have set up.
Vimeo and YouTube
Video is becoming an integral part of the church experience both for broadcasting messages, sermon series previews and also for church marketing. Used effectively it could provide great value for your Church.
1. Utilize Vimeo (Plus or Pro) for embedded clips – Vimeo Plus (or Pro) provides benefits that YouTube does not. Vimeo Plus is a minimal investment of $60 a year and removes Vimeo branding and ads from the videos. If you want more information about Vimeo Pro which costs $199 a year, take a look at the great post Brian wrote about it.
2. Only upload your best videos – I know some Churches get anxious to get their sermons online. But if you’re working with a Flip and recording the audio directly to the camera, you should wait. If the audio can be recorded externally and then synced to the video, then go for it. Also, don’t upload videos that people made with their phone or their own Flip-style cameras. Save those kinds of videos for direct uploading to the Facebook page.
3. Upload to YouTube as well – While, I don’t suggest YouTube for embedded videos, I still suggest uploading the videos to YouTube and using descriptions and tags. 700 billion YouTube videos were viewed in 2010.
Coming Soon…
Google Plus – Google Plus is staking its own claim in the world of social media. It’s growing very fast (25 million visits in one months time), but the jury is still out.
At this time, Google Plus is limited to individual accounts but once corporate accounts are allowed, Google Plus has benefits. Google Plus has circles which will allow you to use a church account to broadcast information to a wide audience or to one very narrow. Watch this closely. Google Plus could be a powerful tool for organizations and it will be interesting to see who leads the way.
Mickey says
Great post, but I disagree about Facebook’s #1 item — “Improve how it looks”. You use that to say that the wall is boring and shouldn’t be the first thing they see, but then #2 and #4 talk about ways to improve the use of the wall.
With a few exceptions, I find those “welcome tabs” to be very similar to the splash pages of the 90’s; an unnecessary inconvenience that slows down a user from getting to the content they want.
Jay Caruso says
Mickey, thanks for the comment. The way Facebook pages work, you can restrict the “Welcome” page to be visible only to those who have not yet clicked on ‘like.’ After that, users can be taken directly to the wall page. I agree it’s not something I necessarily want to see each time, particularly if I am returning user.
Chris Ames says
Here is the single, best improvement you can make to your church’s social media strategy:
Find someone who loves both social media and your church, on your staff or not, and give them authority over that domain.
It’s nearly impossible to manufacture interest and it’s almost always better to leverage someone else’s passion for your cause.
Jay Caruso says
Absolutely.
Moe says
Fantastic post Jay. You brought it here.
I think the church should hire (as in a volunteer who is willing to work for coffee and donuts) a social media person. But not just any person, but someone who knows how to use the medium correctly.
I think this is the reason why some don’t use it wisely. They have their pastor, or secretary doing it without understanding its potential.
Jay Caruso says
Good thoughts Moe! Thanks for the comment!
Chris Ames says
Something else to consider… in most instances the visibility of your church on the web by existing and potential congregants outweighs your actual attendance, active members of extra curricular programming, phone calls, emails, and letters combined.
With startling little effort, your reach is exponentially expanded and your message is able to be actively reinforced for clarity.
Calvin Koepke says
Great article Jay!
Jay Caruso says
Thanks Calvin!
Gangai Victor says
Useful info Jay, learnt a lot, thanks!
Jay Caruso says
Thanks Gangai! I’m glad you found it helpful!
Brian says
Great points! I’ve worked hard this past year with a local church to improve how they use social media. We’ve implemented many of the things you talk about both on their Facebook page – http://www.facebook.com/mission68 AND the new website – http://www.mission68.org.
Today we will be moving them from Disqus’ commenting system to Facebook comments.
Thanks for the article!
Jay Caruso says
Great job Brian! I love the paperclip “Like us above” graphic.
The website is really nice.
Thanks for the comment!
Eric Dye says
This is what ChurchMag is all about!
Jay Caruso says
🙂
Dale says
I guess I’m a bit late to read this but it’s still worth saying thanks for writing it.
Q: Why Vimeo over YouTube?
I find that watching Vimeo vids in iDevices to buffer way more than YouTube.
Can you clarify your preference?
monic woodman says
Great points! I am working with a local church to improve how they use social media.