A great set of slides if you need a few more thoughts to get you going on what you could be doing with social media for your organization.
8 Responses to “Social Media Tactics for Non Profits”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks:
- - December 12, 2009
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Saddington, Carol Thomas. Carol Thomas said: Social Media Tactics for Non Profits: A great set of slides if you need a few more thoughts to get you going on wh… http://bit.ly/8PKqNV [...]
- - December 14, 2009
[...] wanted to share a nicely done slide presentation I ran across this morning. You can find it at: http://churchcrunch.com/social-media-tactics-for-non-profits. It covers all the major social media sites like Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube. While there [...]
- - December 14, 2009
[...] wanted to share a nicely done slide presentation I ran across this morning. You can find it at: http://churchcrunch.com/social-media-tactics-for-non-profits. It covers all the major social media sites like Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube. While there [...]
- - December 14, 2009
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by FortuneHunter3: Social Media Tactics for Non Profits:
A great set of slides if you need a few more thoughts to get you going on wh… http://bit.ly/8PKqNV... - - December 16, 2009
[...] Social Media Tactics for Non-Profits [...]
- - December 16, 2009
[...] Social Media Tactics for Non-Profits – ChurchCrunch [...]
- - December 17, 2009
[...] Media Tactics Slideshow Jump to Comments Church Crunch has a really interesting slideshow that I’ve been wondering how to do! How do you make a [...]
Good stuff in here.
Don't agree with their suggestion of Twitterholic.com.
I checked the site out, and it does "run the numbers"- but that's it. It comes up short because it only give the top tweeps in your city in the following categories:
-Followers
-Friends
-Updates
-Joined (as in when "they" joined Twitter)
All of this info is not very useful in determining what I would deem the actual top 50 (or 100, or 500 or 10k).
For instance- if you filter based on Updates, aka- tweets, tweet bots and spam-tweets easily make it into the higher ranks. Or if you filter on "followers" the super popular (mostly for no real reason- eg, Ashton Kutcher) show up. Then there are the top tweeters that show up because the simply follow every other twitterer known. (Some call this view, as in being opposed to it, being a Twitter-snob. I say it's information filtering.)
At any rate- good suggestions, that should be taken, as with most advice, with a grain of salt.
Thanks John!
~NickShoe