Comments on: Should Christian Blogs be Rated G? http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/ Exploring the Intersection of Church and Technology Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:32:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jim http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41910 Jim Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:54:03 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41910 I'm rated G on all 3 sites...maybe I'll start using more questionable words? I'm rated G on all 3 sites…maybe I'll start using more questionable words?

]]> By: human3rror http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41909 human3rror Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:11:05 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41909 interesting... interesting…

]]> By: human3rror http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41908 human3rror Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:09:06 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41908 very cool. thansk for that! very cool. thansk for that!

]]> By: Joe Chavez http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41907 Joe Chavez Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:08:39 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41907 PG rated for the word ... I still can't believe this ... "limbs." I used the word "limbs" 1x. PG rated for the word … I still can't believe this … "limbs." I used the word "limbs" 1x.

]]> By: bufanator http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41906 bufanator Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:00:35 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41906 My blog was rated R and I do not cuss on my blog. Most of it was in reference to scripture using Hell, death, and something else. Its content and motive behind the blog. My blog was rated R and I do not cuss on my blog. Most of it was in reference to scripture using Hell, death, and something else. Its content and motive behind the blog.

]]> By: bdubrecords http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41905 bdubrecords Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:17:36 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41905 Mine got PG for the words "pain" and "death." I think discussing topics like that are what make blogs worth reading. A blog that views the world through rose colored glasses and never discusses the harsh realities of people's lives is probably not worth reading. So, I think it's OK to be PG, PG-13 or even R. I believe a blog can glorify God and still talk about pain, death and porn. And anyway, it shouldn't be about how many times you use those words. It's about how you discuss them and bring redemptive principles to intersect with real life. Mine got PG for the words "pain" and "death." I think discussing topics like that are what make blogs worth reading. A blog that views the world through rose colored glasses and never discusses the harsh realities of people's lives is probably not worth reading.

So, I think it's OK to be PG, PG-13 or even R. I believe a blog can glorify God and still talk about pain, death and porn. And anyway, it shouldn't be about how many times you use those words. It's about how you discuss them and bring redemptive principles to intersect with real life.

]]> By: Aaron http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41904 Aaron Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:49:35 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41904 Chrissulli hit it. As for the image, you could just use your l33t hax0r skills and reasonably deduct that if the image path for the G-Rated version is <a href="http://www.oneplusyou.com/q/img/bb_badges/rated_g.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.oneplusyou.com/q/img/bb_badges/rated_g...</a> then the R-Rated is obviously <a href="http://www.oneplusyou.com/q/img/bb_badges/rated_r.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.oneplusyou.com/q/img/bb_badges/rated_r...</a> ;) Chrissulli hit it.

As for the image, you could just use your l33t hax0r skills and reasonably deduct that if the image path for the G-Rated version is http://www.oneplusyou.com/q/img/bb_badges/rated_g… then the R-Rated is obviously http://www.oneplusyou.com/q/img/bb_badges/rated_r… ;)

]]> By: ron http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41903 ron Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:49:21 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41903 Mine was G rated. I seriously thought I would get pinged for a post on 'the sex talk". but no. When you post mainly about your wife and kids and what you get up to as a family then I suppose a G rating is expected :) Mine was G rated. I seriously thought I would get pinged for a post on 'the sex talk". but no. When you post mainly about your wife and kids and what you get up to as a family then I suppose a G rating is expected :)

]]> By: ron http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41902 ron Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:45:19 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41902 The original usage of the word moral meant - tradition or custom. The original usage of the word moral meant – tradition or custom.

]]> By: Phillip Gibb http://churchm.ag/should-christian-blogs-be-rated-g/#comment-41901 Phillip Gibb Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:33:44 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=6083#comment-41901 Mine is G-Rated, ha ha - would something technical be other than G- rated?? I think that, as Christians, we need to set the example - we need to be salt and light. yet, lets be realistic - no one is perfect so don't pretend to be. But it does not mean hang out all the dirty washing - there needs to be a filter. Mine is G-Rated, ha ha – would something technical be other than G- rated??

I think that, as Christians, we need to set the example – we need to be salt and light.
yet, lets be realistic – no one is perfect so don't pretend to be.
But it does not mean hang out all the dirty washing – there needs to be a filter.

]]>