[Click for larger view]
OK – so this isn’t a particularly balanced view of things, but still, pretty funny nonetheless!
The #1 Resource for Church Technology Creativity & New Thinking
by James Brooks
[Click for larger view]
OK – so this isn’t a particularly balanced view of things, but still, pretty funny nonetheless!
by James Brooks
Check out these rather funny iPhone app concepts.
Just for fun!
by James Brooks
Inspired by a tweet from a friend asking the best time to visit a museum in London, Dan W. Williams decided to build an app which would work that out for you!
[Read more…] about Avoid The Crowds: Sweet FourSquare API App
by Eric Dye
How’s THAT for a title?
Laser engraved in all natural wood with a vintage film camera design. It’s pretty.
[Read more…] about Wooden Laser Engraved Vintage Camera iPhone Case
by Eric Dye
Rumors about the white iPhone and the iPhone 5 are usually a dime a dozen, appearing on obscure blogs or forums and most of the time it means little. However, when Bloomberg reports on it, the information is likely to be more legit:
Apple Inc. (AAPL) will start selling a white version of its iPhone 4 in the next few weeks, following a delay of 10 months, according to three people with knowledge of the plans.
The new model will be available from AT&T Inc. (T) and Verizon Wireless by the end of April, said one of the people, who asked not to be identified because the plans aren’t public.
[Read more…] about White iPhone To Ship This Month – iPhone 5 In Sept?
by Eric Dye
In the United States, a recent court ruling set legal precedent that modifying or “jailbreaking” your smartphone is legal. The court ruled that copyright law did not apply to “restrictive business models”, thus allowing users to change carriers without changing phones.
The argument that was originally tossed around pivoted on ownership. If you paid for an iPhone, you should be allowed to do with it as you like. It was a right of ownership. Many smartphone owners chalked this up to be a victory, however, I believe the courts ruling, although seemingly in the favor of the owner, skirted the fundamental issue of ownership. The ruling was based on copyright law, restrictive business model, blah-blah-blah … Ownership was never addressed.