<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash-Based Blogging Platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Intersection of Church and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:28:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: human3rror</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50566</link>
		<dc:creator>human3rror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50566</guid>
		<description>functional core......... digging it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>functional core&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; digging it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Wurschmidt</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50565</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Wurschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50565</guid>
		<description>ughhh, Flash.  Very sexy to people, but so many issues, especially from an web marketing standpoint.  I have to admit that I did not even look at this platform and probably will hold off for as long as possible just because they use Flash. 
 
I actually like WP&#039;s thoughts: create a small, very functional core and then allow people to add on whatever they feel is important.  To much clunk out of the box is not always a good thing.  Then again if two of someone&#039;s WP plugins are not playing nice then they are probably all for Kontain&#039;s built-in features.  ha. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ughhh, Flash.  Very sexy to people, but so many issues, especially from an web marketing standpoint.  I have to admit that I did not even look at this platform and probably will hold off for as long as possible just because they use Flash. </p>
<p>I actually like WP&#039;s thoughts: create a small, very functional core and then allow people to add on whatever they feel is important.  To much clunk out of the box is not always a good thing.  Then again if two of someone&#039;s WP plugins are not playing nice then they are probably all for Kontain&#039;s built-in features.  ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human3rror</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50564</link>
		<dc:creator>human3rror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50564</guid>
		<description>rock it dude... you&#039;re a creative guy too, right?  so, your personal should look dope. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rock it dude&#8230; you&#039;re a creative guy too, right?  so, your personal should look dope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediapeople</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50563</link>
		<dc:creator>mediapeople</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50563</guid>
		<description>I know... I am lazy when it comes to my own blog. I actually have a wordpress design waiting  to be sliced and built. Dragging my feet. It&#039;s actually a multi authoring blog too so again my personal stuff waits. thanks for the encouragement though... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know&#8230; I am lazy when it comes to my own blog. I actually have a wordpress design waiting  to be sliced and built. Dragging my feet. It&#039;s actually a multi authoring blog too so again my personal stuff waits. thanks for the encouragement though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human3rror</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50562</link>
		<dc:creator>human3rror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50562</guid>
		<description>may i humbly suggest.. *AHEM*... WORDPRESS.  :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may i humbly suggest.. *AHEM*&#8230; WORDPRESS.  <img src='http://cdn.churchm.ag/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediapeople</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50561</link>
		<dc:creator>mediapeople</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50561</guid>
		<description>I love vox. Design is limited in my opinion but its very easy and integrated well. I would gladly give it up for a better &quot;free&quot; solution but have had a difficult time finding one that matches its ease of function and features. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love vox. Design is limited in my opinion but its very easy and integrated well. I would gladly give it up for a better &quot;free&quot; solution but have had a difficult time finding one that matches its ease of function and features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human3rror</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50560</link>
		<dc:creator>human3rror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50560</guid>
		<description>on another note... haven&#039;t seen a &quot;vox&quot; account in a long time.... you digging that? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on another note&#8230; haven&#039;t seen a &quot;vox&quot; account in a long time&#8230;. you digging that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human3rror</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50559</link>
		<dc:creator>human3rror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50559</guid>
		<description>agreed. one of the intrinsic problems of flash... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed. one of the intrinsic problems of flash&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human3rror</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50558</link>
		<dc:creator>human3rror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50558</guid>
		<description>yes. but i have yet to do the sync.  i&#039;m not as big into FF as you are... sell me in 140 chars or less.  i think i have a good idea of what i&#039;m NOT missing... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes. but i have yet to do the sync.  i&#039;m not as big into FF as you are&#8230; sell me in 140 chars or less.  i think i have a good idea of what i&#039;m NOT missing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonysteward</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/flash-based-blogging-platform/#comment-50557</link>
		<dc:creator>tonysteward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=1194#comment-50557</guid>
		<description>Speaking of commentary - did you realize that IntenseDebate will push your comments automatically to FriendFeed - and then if they are commented on there - that FriendFeed comment will be sync&#039;d inline back on the original post that was commented on? 
 
mmmmm delicious-ness </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of commentary &#8211; did you realize that IntenseDebate will push your comments automatically to FriendFeed &#8211; and then if they are commented on there &#8211; that FriendFeed comment will be sync&#039;d inline back on the original post that was commented on? </p>
<p>mmmmm delicious-ness</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.002 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 471/475 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.churchm.ag

Served from: churchm.ag @ 2012-02-09 22:50:00 -->
