
I’ve been a Flickr user (and a ‘pro’) since 2007. My pro membership was due for renewal on 15th of June – and I didn’t renew! I’ve found Flickr more of a pain to use as another and newer services have come along.
I decided to find an alternative.
I’m not a pro photographer, but I like taking and sharing photos and I’ve got a pretty decent camera. I wanted something that was easy to use, pretty to look at – on the web and mobile – (something that Flickr really isn’t in today’s standards), be ‘findable’ (no point in sharing photos if people can’t find them!) and be able to upload/access from iOS devices (’cause that’s how I roll!) and folders/galleries and easy posting to Twitter would be a nice extra.
So here’s a (brief) look at the alternatives I looked at (and tried in some cases) – and the one I’m happily now using:

Facebook - Yes, it may have the most uploaded photos out there, but I’m not exactly a fan of Facebook (if I didn’t need it for work, I wouldn’t have an account), so this was out as an option straightaway…

Instagram - Although lovely for making your photos all retro and square, and it’s on my iPhone, there’s no nice web service (without using a third party service/site) and now it’s own by Facebook, that also doesn’t encourage me!

Tumblr – I know several people who use Tumblr as their main way of sharing photos, but for me Tumblr is almost ‘too social’ and I’m not a huge fan of the Tumblr visuals/design.

Google+ – Google’s own social network is really getting into photos – well if you use Android! From the desktop and iOS I found no better to use than Flickr. Also I’m not really a Google+ user, so it didn’t really fit the bill (and the url of the albums/photos are very long and not exactly memorable!).

ZangZing - is a new and interesting looking service. There’s easy importing from a range of existing sites and services (including Flickr) and very security and sharing tools. In fact this is how ZangZing really works, it’s designed for sharing albums with groups of people – rather than being ‘out there’ for all to see. You can also allow certain people to add photos to albums. I can see this being brilliant for church youth groups, clubs, even missionaries, where photos taken at events/parties can be uploaded/shared between only to the people you want to allow to see them/comment on them. But it’s not quite what I’m looking for… (From July 2012 ZangZing is offering paid options for extra space – the free account will have 2GB, plenty for most people.)

SmugMug – is a great site and service with loads of great features. However, it’s really designed for pro & semi-pro photographers who are looking to show their services and sell their photos (not really me).

Pinterest – Now you can upload photos/pins directly to Pinterest, this rather appealed to me. I love the way Pinterest displays images and boards can be used as folders/galleries. However, I wondered about the ‘re-pinning’ aspect and just how I could control the use of my photos… Also I’ve not been able to find a sane iOS direct upload method. (And due the nature of Pinterest, I can always pin my own photos from another site…) Here’s my photos board on Pinterest.

Dropbox and views.fm – I LOVE Dropbox, it’s part of my daily workflow. And with it’s Camera Upload Feature, I thought this could be a great option. When you add upload/add photos (to the ‘Photos’ folder) it even turns it into a gallery/slideshow for you (albeit not a very pretty one). However, you have to give these urls out to people to find them (both a good and a bad thing…). I wondered if there was a service that could make Dropbox prettier – turns out there is: views.fm! It’s a brilliantly simple service that takes any existing Dropbox folder (or you can add a new one) and turns it into a rather lovely page. Here’s a very simple one I made with a couple of photos in: http://jpc101.views.fm/share. You’re not limited to photos either, it can display audio and video files as well. The one main drawback is it’s not easy to find. However, this might not be a bad thing if you want to nicely share items with a selected group of people. And although I didn’t go for this as my main photo sharing option, it’s certainly something I’ll be using to show layouts/designs to my clients!

Posterous – I used Posterous for my (very sporadic) personal blog for several years because of it’s ease of use. So I wondered if I could convert it into a photoblog/gallery. I’ve used my Posterous photo friendly theme and it’s pretty nice. However, iOS uploads isn’t the greatest by any means and I fear that now it’s owned by Twitter that it might suffer the same fate as Flickr under Yahoo! – stagnation and a slow lingering death…

Twitter – Having just expressed concerns about Twitter owning Posterous, it might surprise you that I very seriously considered using Twitter as my Flickr alternative! It’s very easy to upload photos using any good Twitter client (Echofon is my client of choice on the Mac and iOS.) and Twitter’s own photo storage backend is powered by photobucket (which isn’t listed here in its own right as it’s just too ugly!) and I really do like the photo grid it uses to display photos uploaded on a tweet, here’s mine. However, I decided it was a little too ‘one dimensional’ – no easy way to share a photo at a nice big size and certainly no folders/galleries. So I’ll be using it to share silly and ‘social’ photos but not the place to store my really nice, and larger, photos.

OpenPhoto – This is a new service on the block and looks very interesting. It’s an open source photo sharing service which allows you to store your photos on either Dropbox or Amazon’s S3 hosting (very cheap scalable pay as you use hosting). It seems to have a great developer community behind it and there’s some nice features being developed such as import tools and albums. There’s also an iPhone app for uploading photos (Google Play app is in the works). Here’s a few of my photos on OpenPhoto. However, it’s still very much in the growing stage at the moment and I’m sure will be a fantastic service, but it’s not quite what I’m looking for yet.
That’s quite a few services I’ve looked at, now all that’s left is the winner and the Flickr replacement I’m happily using:

500px – This great site and service was recommended to me by fellow ChurchMag author Jay Caruso – and I’m really glad he did! In a word 500px is BRILLIANT! It displays photos in a stunning way, is a joy to use and has all the features I was looking for. So here are my photos on 500px. The community on the site is great and there are some simply awesome and inspiring (and humbling) photographers on there. Overall feedback is given via ‘affection’ – a combination of views/likes/favs and comments and each photo has it’s ‘pulse’ again, calculated on those stats. There are three membership options, the two paid ones offering features like sets, stats and unlimited uploads (the free option allows up to 10 uploads a week). There’s an iPad app which allows you to view photos on the site, but not upload – for that I found PhotoStackr for 500px which works on all iOS devices and does uploading as well as a really nice browsing interface. You can also add the photos from people you follow on 500px and the editor’s choice photos on Flipboard. Although I’m not actively looking to sell my photos, one nice feature on 500px (for all users) is that if your photo is larger than 3600px on the longest size, it can be sold in the 500px market (either as an HD download or canvas print). I’m VERY happy with 500px and look forward to using it for years to come!
So that was my choice.
Do you still use Flickr?
Have you found an alternative – if so what?
[Image via ilker]




The only problem with 500px is that they allow nudes. I’m not going to get into whether or not we should have a problem with nudes on an artistic site. But, a visitor (who might be offended by nudes) who comes to see your photos might find themselves inundated with nudes if they browse some of the other photographers. 500px does have an option for turning off nudes, but this relies mostly on an honor system, and some photographers do not tag their pictures as nudes.
Yes there are nudes, but when browsing you have to click to see the image – there’s a warning. I’ve stumbled across nudes on flickr as well (with no warning).
And on tumblr – well you can find just about anything without any warning (actually another reason I stayed clear of tumblr).
You only have to click if someone properly tagged it as nude.
True, but at least they’ve thought of a system for ‘responsible’ people – more than on any other photo-sharing site I’ve seen (and more than flickr’s got…)!
“at least they’ve thought of a system” – absolutely
Great write-up.
I’ve been in this same boat for years now – looking for an alternative to Flickr. I just have this sense that one day Yahoo is going to kill it. Right now, I’m actually actively using 3 different services.
Flickr: I still really like it.
PicasaWeb/Google+: I use Picasa (desktop) to manage the organization of all my photos, and I really like where Google is going, but I’m finding it too difficult to share photos. For me, all they’d need to do was make nice URL’s. I could probably just use Google’s own URL shortener, but this should be built in for sharing.
500px: You are right, this site is the bomb.
Still, though, Flickr is sort of my go-to place for storing/sharing photos.
Thanks Brian. Although I’m a Mac, I prefer Picasa to iPhoto! But the albums are just too ugly for me
and as you said the urls are not good…
I’m following you back on 500px
very cute mog you’ve got!
At the moment I’m using Facebook for photos of events/gatherings that I want to share with just friends and Pinterest for photos I want to share more broadly. Pinterest seems to be a good option for smaller batches but I suspect it could be annoying if you had large numbers of photos to update
Thanks Joanna. I think Pinterest certainly could become a big photo-sharing site – be interesting to see how it goes.
I am researching and am overwhelmed. HELP! Our church was using ZangZing (and LOVED IT!) but they just closed their doors.
I need to select another service PRONTO.
Our needs are two-fold: storage/archival of high res/large photos, and a service that offers easy photo sharing via Facebook or other social media sites. Specifically:
1) A service that allows one username & password that all our assigned photographers can use to upload photos to the church’s account. Cover an event, upload pics, share on FB, and you’re done.
2) A service that allows easy sharing to Facebook a folder/album of photos.
3) A service that allows storage of high resolution photos.
4) Free or low-cost.
5) Would prefer albums/folders to have unique URLS for easy sharing in print references. i.e. http://www.zangzing.com/roswellumc/vbs2012
Any advice?
Hi Susan.
I think openphoto might fit your needs.
The biggest problemis #2. Facebook is basically a pain to interact with (and they change the rules with no warning)! Facebook also more and more want to keep everything with them and not let you use other services with them…
Openphoto is free and uses dropbox to store the photos and you can let multiple people log into a dropbox or openphoto account. There’s also mobile apps for uploading (which allow some facebook adding). It’s still in the ‘growing’ process but more features are being added frequently. There’s not customizable album/gallery names (yet), but I imagaine they’ll be be coming soon-ish!
You could also look at http://views.fm/ it also uses dropbox for storage (and you upload to dropbox directly). You then create albums with it’s service. You can ‘share’ on FB/twitter but there’s no FB uploading…
I hope that helps you.
Hello
There is also Piikx.com :
An image hosting system dedicated to photographers and image searchers with automated website and photo blogging system, and a plethora of productivity and image protection features, including online image selling.
Registration is free.
Features list is available here:
http://www.piikx.com/features.php
Automated photographer’s website example here:
http://jpdn.piikx.com
Main URL is:
http://www.piikx.com
Feedback and suggestions are welcome!