<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ChurchRater.com &#8211; Helpful or Harmful?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Intersection of Church and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:46:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Henderson</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38354</guid>
		<description>Thanks for noticing us. Some of you seem to have a much more pesimistic view of the church than most of the people on churchrater.


Have you actually read some of the ratings?
Looks like most people ( and not a few pastors) believe if you get inside their doors,  heaven will rain down on you.

Where&#039;s all the worry and negativity coming from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for noticing us. Some of you seem to have a much more pesimistic view of the church than most of the people on churchrater.</p>
<p>Have you actually read some of the ratings?<br />
Looks like most people ( and not a few pastors) believe if you get inside their doors,  heaven will rain down on you.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s all the worry and negativity coming from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephenbateman</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38353</link>
		<dc:creator>stephenbateman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38353</guid>
		<description>smells like a brewing flame-war to me.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smells like a brewing flame-war to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38352</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38352</guid>
		<description>oof...not sure about this one...wouuld you want them to rate your church?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oof&#8230;not sure about this one&#8230;wouuld you want them to rate your church?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevincooper</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38351</link>
		<dc:creator>kevincooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38351</guid>
		<description>I never understood church rankings/ratings or the importance of them. It might be a good way to get people in the door to a particular church but if that church can&#039;t keep &#039;em coming back, then it&#039;s really not worth it. Can&#039;t see this as a valuable tool --but I&#039;ve been wrong before. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood church rankings/ratings or the importance of them. It might be a good way to get people in the door to a particular church but if that church can&#039;t keep &#039;em coming back, then it&#039;s really not worth it. Can&#039;t see this as a valuable tool &#8211;but I&#039;ve been wrong before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38348</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38348</guid>
		<description>I really do think its a wonderful idea.  It will help others root out and find pockets of church-badness.  It will also help circle them up and condemn them more efficiently.  Hey wait - this has already been done:  Early Rome, the Spanish Inquisition, Salem Witch Trials, etc etc.   
 
What a great idea.  I can&#039;t wait to join and participate in the stone throwing.  I mean, that&#039;s biblical after all... no? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do think its a wonderful idea.  It will help others root out and find pockets of church-badness.  It will also help circle them up and condemn them more efficiently.  Hey wait &#8211; this has already been done:  Early Rome, the Spanish Inquisition, Salem Witch Trials, etc etc.   </p>
<p>What a great idea.  I can&#039;t wait to join and participate in the stone throwing.  I mean, that&#039;s biblical after all&#8230; no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Lenger</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38350</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Lenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38350</guid>
		<description>harmful. especially considering their superficial and ambiguous rating categories. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>harmful. especially considering their superficial and ambiguous rating categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klreed189</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38349</link>
		<dc:creator>klreed189</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38349</guid>
		<description>I actually look at the star rating, especially in the app store. If it is a 2 or 3 I stay away. 
Church Crunch gets 4 1/2 stars (Maybe next month I will up it to 5 stars) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually look at the star rating, especially in the app store. If it is a 2 or 3 I stay away.<br />
Church Crunch gets 4 1/2 stars (Maybe next month I will up it to 5 stars)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klreed189</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38347</link>
		<dc:creator>klreed189</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38347</guid>
		<description>You nailed it </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nailed it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AussieSim</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38346</link>
		<dc:creator>AussieSim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38346</guid>
		<description>Somewhat scary... 
 
I&#039;ve found in secular websites that we humans only post when we have something to complain about... I don&#039;t often feel the urge to review something that was awesome, but I do feel that I want to complain about bad experiences (customer service/products). Maybe that&#039;s just me... 
Let&#039;s hope it doesn&#039;t spiral into a website for all those who need to vent. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhat scary&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#039;ve found in secular websites that we humans only post when we have something to complain about&#8230; I don&#039;t often feel the urge to review something that was awesome, but I do feel that I want to complain about bad experiences (customer service/products). Maybe that&#039;s just me&#8230;<br />
Let&#039;s hope it doesn&#039;t spiral into a website for all those who need to vent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Holmes</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38345</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/2009/09/23/churchrater-com-helpful-or-harmful/#comment-38345</guid>
		<description>Yeah...I don&#039;t see that as something I would use in the near future. I mean, there are certain intangibles that really can&#039;t be measured. 

But who knows? The idea may grow on me...as well as on others. 

Be blessed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;I don&#8217;t see that as something I would use in the near future. I mean, there are certain intangibles that really can&#8217;t be measured. </p>
<p>But who knows? The idea may grow on me&#8230;as well as on others. </p>
<p>Be blessed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.001 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 467/471 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.churchm.ag

Served from: churchm.ag @ 2012-02-09 19:01:59 -->
