<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Church 3.0 is Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Intersection of Church and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:40:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Church 2.0 / 3.0 / 0.5? &#124; Church Mag</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-51936</link>
		<dc:creator>Church 2.0 / 3.0 / 0.5? &#124; Church Mag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-51936</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday was a day of great conversation as I had the opportunity to twitter-chat with @gregatkinson about Church 2.0 / Church 3.0 / Church .5 which began out of discourse from my post on Church 3.0 as Open Source. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday was a day of great conversation as I had the opportunity to twitter-chat with @gregatkinson about Church 2.0 / Church 3.0 / Church .5 which began out of discourse from my post on Church 3.0 as Open Source. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles K Barry</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-49838</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles K Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-49838</guid>
		<description>I agree with you - suggested resource confirming this trend&#039; &quot;The Starfish and the spider&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you &#8211; suggested resource confirming this trend&#8217; &#8220;The Starfish and the spider&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church 2.0 / 3.0 / 0.5? - ChurchCrunch</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-49837</link>
		<dc:creator>Church 2.0 / 3.0 / 0.5? - ChurchCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-49837</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday was a day of great conversation as I had the opportunity to twitter-chat with @gregatkinson about Church 2.0 / Church 3.0 / Church .5 which began out of discourse from my post on Church 3.0 as Open Source. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday was a day of great conversation as I had the opportunity to twitter-chat with @gregatkinson about Church 2.0 / Church 3.0 / Church .5 which began out of discourse from my post on Church 3.0 as Open Source. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human3rror</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-49834</link>
		<dc:creator>human3rror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-49834</guid>
		<description>Jose, glad you joined in though!  I think there&#039;s so much to be added here (and of course it isn&#039;t fully fleshed out yet). 
 
have a great weekend and take it easy1 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jose, glad you joined in though!  I think there&#039;s so much to be added here (and of course it isn&#039;t fully fleshed out yet). </p>
<p>have a great weekend and take it easy1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_HC</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-49833</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_HC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-49833</guid>
		<description>I am quite new to this discussion (at large) but on the software and media side of things the church is not open...  probably should be and will get there.  Especially when more and more people begin to realize that the open and networked nature of web 2.0 is an amazing vehicle to reach the lost.  I definitely need to think more about this ... thanks for pushing me forward on the topic. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am quite new to this discussion (at large) but on the software and media side of things the church is not open&#8230;  probably should be and will get there.  Especially when more and more people begin to realize that the open and networked nature of web 2.0 is an amazing vehicle to reach the lost.  I definitely need to think more about this &#8230; thanks for pushing me forward on the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-49832</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-49832</guid>
		<description>@Greg,

As mentioned in my tweet, I believe Church2.0 has elements of open source, but it&#039;s not as open as people believe.

Just take a look at apps being developed right now... where do you see open standards?  it&#039;s certainly not a standard... yet.

my thought is that church 2.0 is really web 1.0 (this is super simple processing here, but I think my point can be understood).

church 3.0 is web 2.0 for the mainstream, and so-on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Greg,</p>
<p>As mentioned in my tweet, I believe Church2.0 has elements of open source, but it&#8217;s not as open as people believe.</p>
<p>Just take a look at apps being developed right now&#8230; where do you see open standards?  it&#8217;s certainly not a standard&#8230; yet.</p>
<p>my thought is that church 2.0 is really web 1.0 (this is super simple processing here, but I think my point can be understood).</p>
<p>church 3.0 is web 2.0 for the mainstream, and so-on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-49831</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-49831</guid>
		<description>Please know that I like and agree with your blog post - it&#039;s just that what you&#039;re talking about IS Church 2.0. 

As I&#039;ve traveled the country speaking to Church leaders the last 8 years, I&#039;ve found that most of the Church is at 0.5 - it&#039;s a HUGE stretch to get them to 2.0. 

But in what we (myself, Tony Steward and Cynthia Ware) are calling &quot;Church 2.0&quot; is the value and philosophy of open source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please know that I like and agree with your blog post &#8211; it&#8217;s just that what you&#8217;re talking about IS Church 2.0. </p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve traveled the country speaking to Church leaders the last 8 years, I&#8217;ve found that most of the Church is at 0.5 &#8211; it&#8217;s a HUGE stretch to get them to 2.0. </p>
<p>But in what we (myself, Tony Steward and Cynthia Ware) are calling &#8220;Church 2.0&#8243; is the value and philosophy of open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-49830</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-49830</guid>
		<description>In the book and movement known as Church 2.0 - open source is a very big part of it. We are a long way from anything 3.0, bro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the book and movement known as Church 2.0 &#8211; open source is a very big part of it. We are a long way from anything 3.0, bro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: human3rror (human3rror)</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-49835</link>
		<dc:creator>human3rror (human3rror)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-49835</guid>
		<description>RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/churchcrunch&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@churchcrunch&lt;/a&gt;: New blog post: Church 3.0 is Open Source http://tinyurl.com/6rdz4h - read about the future during lunch: open source baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/churchcrunch" rel="nofollow">@churchcrunch</a>: New blog post: Church 3.0 is Open Source <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6rdz4h" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6rdz4h</a> &#8211; read about the future during lunch: open source baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: churchcrunch (churchcrunch)</title>
		<link>http://churchm.ag/church-30-is-open-source/#comment-49836</link>
		<dc:creator>churchcrunch (churchcrunch)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=434#comment-49836</guid>
		<description>New blog post: Church 3.0 is Open Source http://tinyurl.com/6rdz4h</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New blog post: Church 3.0 is Open Source <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6rdz4h" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6rdz4h</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 467/471 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.churchm.ag

Served from: churchm.ag @ 2012-02-09 16:09:48 -->
